Sunday, April 27, 2008

SECONDARY RUNWAY IN TAKEOFF MODE

26-Apr-2008



After Its Expansion By 1,400 Metres, Chennai Will See An Increased Traffic Of Bigger Planes Like 747s And A-300s

V Ayyappan TNN

Chennai: As the fate of the Chennai airport expansion plan — construction of a parallel runway, taxi way and a terminal — has run into land acquisition problems, the Airports Authority of India (AAI) has decided to speed up the extension of the 2,085-m secondary runway by 1,400 metres as a temporary measure.



Currently, the secondary runway is only used by small aircraft including 70-seater ATRs which fly on shorter routes such as Chennai-Madurai. Extending this runway will allow the airport to use it for landings and take-offs for wide-bodied aircraft such as 747s and A-300s as well. Air Traffic controllers are currently being trained to handle flights on the existing runway and the secondary one simultaneously, said a senior official. This will help the airport to handle additional traffic.



The decision to extend the secondary runway has been taken in light of the fact that the state government has expressed difficulty in acquiring 1,069 acres of land required west of Adyar river for building a new parallel runway. The government has so far acquired just 300 acres of the identified land because costs of acquisition have become prohibitive.



This has come as a blow to the AAI which was gearing up to execute the expansion plan after Ma-dras High Court cleared the project by dismissing objections raised by residents and builders in the area. The airport which handles 7.5 million passengers every year, is now left with just one option to augment aircraft handling capacity - extend the secondary runway and install an Instrument Landing System (ILS) to make it capable of h o s t i n g landings. This will then help the airport to han-dle an additional 23 flights per hour as against the current 27 per hour.



Struggling to cope with the rise in traffic — close to 400 operations everyday — it was only recently that the AAI opened the secondary runway at Chennai for takeoffs by small aircraft. The cross runway operations thereby helped the airport to transfer take-offs of smaller aircraft like ATRs used by low-cost airlines from the 3,658-metre primary runway to the smaller secondary runway, said airport director Dinesh Kumar.



Speeding up the extension of the secondary runway will be easier than pushing for a parallel run-way because of two reasons: only 140 acres of land is required for it and the ministry of civil avia-tion has already applied for clearance for the project from the Public Investment Board and the ministry of environment and forests. The only likely impediment will be faced by the technical wing because the runway has to be ex-tended over the river - a spot prone to flooding during rains.



To coincide with the runway expansion, AAI is also planning to build a massive 70,000 square me-ter domestic passenger terminal II on the northern side of the existing domestic terminal. "The first floor will be used for departure while second floor will be used for arrival,” said Dinesh Kumar. From an annual growth rate of 11 per cent in 2001-2002, passenger movement in Chennai has shot up to 51 per cent in 2006-2007.



The new terminal would bring about massive addition of space and in turn augment passenger handling capacity, he said. “The new terminal is expected to take care of the domestic passenger growth expected in the next five years. The idea is to equip the airport to handle more passengers by the time the expansion works gets going.”



Construction will be funded from the Rs 1,800 crore earmarked for the expansion project, he added. Incidentally, the expansion plan is well behind schedule — the targeted date of completion was 2010. AAI chairman K Ramalingam said construction of the parallel runway would be taken up in due course despite the cost escalation and trouble in land acquisition. “Many such works will be handled in phases,” he said.



10 more parking bays in 2009


Chennai: The Airports Authority of India is all set to lift the passenger facilities and aesthetics of the Chennai airport to international standards by 2010. A



short-term infrastructure augmentation programme — including modernization of existing terminals, construction of more parking bays, installation of stateof-the-art weather monitoring systems and air traffic control equipment — has been kicked off for better handling of passenger and aircraft traffic. “We are working to make Chennai airport on a par with the best airports in the world,” said Dinesh Kumar, the airport director.



Ten more parking bays will be built next year. Four of them will be large enough to accommodate the wide-bodied 747. Three remote aircraft parking stands, big enough to park the giant Airbus 380, have already been built as more airlines have asked for permission to operate out of Chennai. At present, the airport has 57 aircraft parking bays.



As part of modernisation, the domestic terminal space was increased by 980 sq mt and the first floor opened for departures. Today, the domestic terminal is spread over is 19,000 sq mt, which includes departure I and departure II. International arrival is being modernized through renovation of the existing terminal in two phases. The first phase saw setting up of four green channel counters, 10 red channel customs counters and six inclined bay baggage conveyor belts, a unique feature. The second phase is in progress. At present, the international terminal is spread over 37,156 sq mt.



Passengers who use the airport frequently also feel the need for upgradation of facilities. “The number of check-in counters, baggage-scanning machines and security-check counters need to be doubled in both domestic and international terminals,” says D Sudhakara Reddy, president of Air Passenger Association of India.



“The 32 check-in counters in each terminal are not adequate to handle the steep rise in passenger traffic. There are long queues every day, affecting departure of the flights during peak hours,” an airline official said.

www.timesofindia.com

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Second intenational airport likely 9 years before schedule

19-Apr-2008

Second intenational airport likely 9 years before schedule

Target Date 2015 As Present

Airport's Expansion Stalls

CHENNAI: The city is likely to get a spanking new airport by 2015, nine years before the earlier D-day. The greenfield project will be taken up on 4,822 acres of land near Sriperumbudur, northwest of Chennai, at an estimated cost of Rs 3,500 crore. The dates have been advanced in light of certain trouble — largely relating to land acquisition — that cropped up in the Rs 2,350-crore modernisation and expansion project of Kamaraj International Airport at Meenambakkam.

Unlike Bangalore and Hyderabad, Chennai's old airport will not be shut down when the new one comes up. Rather, the city will have two airports like those planned in Delhi and Mumbai. The search for a private consortium to build the airport will start soon. It will be offered a 74% stake, while the state and central governments will hold 13% each.

Officials told The Times of India that the state government had expressed difficulty in acquiring the 1,069 acres of land required west of the Adyar river for building a parallel runway as part of phase-II of the Meenambakkam expansion plan. It is proving tough to get more than 300 acres of the land identified as the costs are prohibitively high. It's also difficult to clear the entire area of habitation, a state government official said.

At current prices, the government estimates it will cost Rs 2,000 crore to acquire the land. Besides, the Madras High Court recently ruled that the government could acquire land, but it's learnt that chief minister M Karunanidhi is not keen on displacing too many households in the area as he anticipates an adverse political fallout.

In the wake of these developments, the civil aviation ministry, in consultation with the state government, decided to speed up the greenfield airport at Sriperumbudur. Land for the new airport can be acquired easily as it belongs to the government.

Joint secretary, ministry of civil aviation, K N Shrivastava said air traffic was likely to grow faster in Chennai than earlier projected and would justify the decision on a new airport. The ministry will set up a committee to decide how flights will be distributed between the two airports. It is too early to be specific on which flights (international, domestic and low-cost airlines) will operate from where, an official said.

New airport is a high priority: Secy

Chennai: Tamil Nadu transport secretary Debendranath Sarangi has confirmed that the state government was pressing the Centre to take up the Sriperumbudur airport project on a priority basis because the Meenambakkam airport would not be able to handle the growing traffic demands beyond 2015.


Sarangi said a feasibility study was being undertaken by the Airports Authority of India. The Meenambakkam airport and the proposed airport at Sriperumbudur are separated by 25 km as the crow flies and will not come in each other's path, he said.


Chennai handles 10 million passengers a year, and the passenger traffic is projected to grow to 22 million over the next 10 to 12 years when the planned construction of a parallel runway and a second terminal at Meenambakkam phase-II is completed, an AAI official said.


But if the government decides not to acquire land adjacent to the airport, a new airport becomes an absolute necessity.


Work on lengthening the secondary runway at Meenambakkam, from 6,900 to 10,000 feet, is on as part of the phase-I expansion. Once that is done, it will ease pressure on Meenambakkam and with some deft management can keep the traffic going until 2015.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Chennai/Second_intenational_airport_likely_9_years_before_schedule/articleshow/2962938.cms

Chennai may miss out on aviation boom

16-Apr-2008


“If airport doesn’t enhance capacity, airlines will choose Bangalore and Hyderabad”

CHENNAI: Chennai is tumbling down the pecking order of airports in the south.Given the continuing congestion and infrastructure woes at the Chennai airport, coupled with the setting up of new airports with world-class facilities in Hyderabad and Bangalore, the city risks missing out on the aviation boom in the south.


In the last 10 months, passenger traffic grew by 28 per cent in Bangalore compared to 20 per cent in Chennai. Bangalore handled 84 lakh passengers during this period. The brand new facility at Devanahalli is equipped to handle more than 1 crore passengers a year. Chennai, however, is already close to operating at the full capacity of 89 lakh passengers, airport officials say.“If Chennai doesn’t enhance its capacity, airlines will naturally choose Bangalore and Hyderabad,” M. Thiagarajan, managing director of Paramount Airways, which has a 26 per cent market share in the south, told The Hindu.


After legal wrangles that delayed the airport expansion and modernisation project by almost three years, work on expanding and improving the airport’s infrastructure is set to start on April 24. But, it may take at least another three years before the parallel runway is fully operational to allow a significant growth in handling capacity.


“The modernisation has come a bit too late,” says D. Sudhakara Reddy, president, Air Passengers Association of India. “Until we are ready to handle extra loads and new airlines start coming in, they will prefer flying to other airports. Chennai has so far been the gateway to the south, but unless there is a rapid modernisation, it will lose its primacy.”


Hyderabad has the added advantage of offering cheaper aviation turbine fuel (ATF) to air carriers. The Andhra Pradesh government has reduced the cess on ATF to four per cent, as compared to 30 per cent in Tamil Nadu.


Mr. Thiagarajan said Paramount was looking at substantially adding to its flights in Bangalore and Hyderabad in the next few months to make the most of the new infrastructure. However, the airports had to quickly sort out their teething troubles such as the high user development charges and connectivity issues.


Capt. G.R. Gopinath, executive chairman of Deccan airlines, told The Hindu that if Chennai was to keep pace with the growth in the south, mere expansion of the airport was not enough: the city also needed to quickly complete its greenfield airport project at Sriperumbudur to substantially enhance the handling capacity. “With the growth we are experiencing, cities undoubtedly require multiple airports,” he said. “Chennai must learn from the mistakes [made in Bangalore and Hyderabad] and not create a monopoly.”


He urged the airport authorities to provide adequate connectivity. “We expect the greenfield airport to come up in four or five years in Chennai, and unlike what happened in Bangalore, we should make sure both the metro rail project and the airport are built concurrently.”


http://www.hindu.com/2008/04/16/stories/2008041660320700.htm

AAI to upgrade Kolkata, Chennai airports

11-Apr-2008

NEW DELHI: The Airports Authority of India (AAI) will upgrade the Kolkata and Chennai airports at a cost of Rs 3,800 crore.

“AAI will spend Rs. 2,000 crore to modernise the Kolkata airport and Rs. 1,800 crore for the Chennai airport. The modernisation process has to be completed by 2010-11,” Chairman K. Ramalingam said here on Thursday.

In Kolkata, a new runway would be laid along the existing one. In Chennai, the existing cross runway would be operationalised and an additional runway built.

“The in-principle approval for the modernisation plans of the two airports has been given.” The projects would be carried out solely by AAI.

3rd runway in Delhi

A third runway at the Delhi airport would be commissioned by September.
Speaking at the inauguration of ‘Aerodrome India 2008’, a three-day international exhibition on airport infrastructure, security and services, Mr. Ramalingam said there was need to build aviation infrastructure at a faster rate to manage traffic and build capacity at airports.

Indian airports handled 73.3 million passengers and 1.4 million tonnes of cargo in 2005-06. Civil aviation is expected to enjoy a compounded growth of about 25 per cent per annum for the next 10 years, according to official estimates.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/04/11/stories/2008041153991400.htm

AAI shortlists six cos for airports revamp

11-Apr-2008

About Modernisation and Greenfield Airport

NEW DELHI: The Airports Authority of India (AAI) has shortlisted six companies, including domestic major L&T, for executing the Rs 3,800-crore Chennai and Kolkata airports modernisation projects. About 15 international construction majors had approached the AAI to get these projects.

According to sources, the shortlisted companies include ITD (Hong Kong), Ssangyong (Malaysia) and M/s TAV Tepe Akfen (Turkey). L&T, which has bagged contracts for modernising Delhi and Mumbai airports from GMR and GVK, is also in the race for Kolkata and Chennai. The foreign companies have Indian partners for their airport JVs.

AAI is learnt to have shortlisted three companies for being appointed as project management consultants, who would oversee the implementation of these two projects on a turnkey basis. Leading firms like US-based Louis Berger Group are among the shortlisted companies, said the sources.

The Kolkata airport will be modernised at a cost of Rs 2,000 crore and Chennai for Rs 1,800 crore. The AAI had received 11 applications for Kolkata and 12 for Chennai expansion programmes from construction majors of Korean, Thailand, America, Europe and other countries. The global names included Greece's AEGEK General Construction; Malaysia's Muhibbah Engineering and Britain's largest privately owned construction firm Laing O'Rourke.

The committee of infrastructure headed by PM Manmohan Singh had approved the Kolkata modernisation project last April and Chennai proposal in June. The government had initially promised that work would start in January or by February, 2008.

Kolkata airport modernisation has so far got pre-Public Investment Board (PIB) clearance but awaits PIB and CCEA nod. Chennai is yet to get all these three clearances. Aviation minister Praful Patel wants these projects to begin on time so that they can meet the 2010-11 deadline. So even as technical approvals are awaited, AAI was asked to go ahead and do its bit so that work can begin on ground as soon as all required clearances come.

"Work was to begin this February. Which means already there is a delay and unless clearances come in fast, meeting the deadline of 2010-11 could be an uphill task," said sources, reflecting a "general feeling" that AAI projects don't get the same sense of urgency as private ones do.

Tamil Nadu government has also identified 5,000 acres of land near Sripeumbudur for building the second airport for Chennai. AAI is doing pre-feasibility studies as the state government wants the second airport to be ready in time.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Business/India_Business/AAI_shortlists_six_cos_for_airports_revamp/articleshow/2942556.cms

News in Dinamalar: Aboout expansion

10-Apr-2008



News in Malaimalar: About expansion and Greenfield Airport

9-Apr-2008



News in Malaisudar: About expansion and Greenfield Airport

9-Apr-2008



Saturday, April 19, 2008

London Gatwick and Chennai — The tale of two airports

02-Apr-2008




Capt A. Ranganathan

From the beginning of this century, Indian aviation has been projected to be shining. But the clear skies are often clouded with the darkness of inefficiency and corruption. Maybe, Indian aviation should learn from Albert Einstein’s famous saying: “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is to not stop questioning”
The airport expansion plans have been worked out by various committees, Parliament delegations, etc. Projections have been made by the Civil Aviation Ministry, the DGCA, Airports Authority of India, several aviation agencies and experts and the airlines too.


Learn from yesterday


Let us look at the last 25 years of the 20th century. What was the projected growth and what was the realised growth? We had a flood of airlines joining the fray and most of them, along with the poor trusting investors, bit the dust. Only three survived and one of them had the financial support of the government which doled out largesse from tax-payer’s money. Inefficiency was overlooked and corruption went into overdrive to sustain the system.


Live for today


We started this century with a lot of fanfare. Projections and comparisons with other growing nations were dished out. How can we let the Chinese dragon get ahead? We have to announce growth projections that humble the dragon. We have airlines announcing orders for hundreds of aircraft. Never mind if we don’t have the pilots to fly them. Never mind if we don’t have the engineers to maintain them. And never mind if we don’t have air traffic controllers to man the crucial system, on which safety in the air largely depends.

For Indian aviation to shine, a day has 48 hours and not 24 hours that an ordinary mortal is used to. We announce that our airports are congested and we need more airports, bigger airports and greener airports. We have to prove to the world that we are better than China and we can build better airports than Singapore. Are we anywhere near achieving these hopes?

To fill the over-capacity on an aeroplane, we sell tickets at well below sustainable levels. We fill up the skies with uneconomical flights and create chaos at airports, which cannot handle the traffic because of inefficiency and outdated procedures. And based on this overstated and over-estimated average, we build growth rate castles in the air.

Let us accept our limitations. In five years we could not create the infrastructure for new airports in two cities. And we have started talking about 500 airports! Let us run the current airports efficiently and to optimum levels. Blowing up public funds on Utopian projects is not the way to growth.


Hope for tomorrow


Take the case of what is happening to the new airports in Hyderabad and Bangalore. The bankruptcy of our system is exposed with those two projects. As long as this coalition dharma of corrupt politicians and bureaucrats runs the system, there is no hope. All the projects and all the money involved in executing them will go down the drain. And it is the hard-earned money of every taxpayer that is wasted by this incompetence.


We have the expertise in India but we choose to ignore the competent but promote the incompetent. Our current airports are quite capable of handling 50 movements an hour using efficient systems and procedures. If the projections indicate a growth beyond this figure from 2015, let us realise that we have seven more years to plan and execute the requirement. The important thing is to not stop questioning


Take the case of Chennai airport. Plans are made for expansion. It is announced that the traffic potential is so large that the airport needs a parallel runway, that the second runway has to be extended, displacing thousands of honest, tax-paying citizens. What is this exercise for, is the question that every taxpayer should ask.


Chennai airport handles 129,575 aircraft movements a year. This is based on the 355 movements per day that Airports Authority of India has given out. The airport is open for 24 hours of operation. There are just a few hours when the traffic peaks to around 28 movements in an hour.


The AAI has projected that, by 2015 there will be 50 movement an hour. For this grand increase, more than Rs 1,000 crore is to be spent to build the second runway, displacing a 1,000 families from their residences, paying a pittance as compensation and, in the process, filling several deep pockets.


Compare this with London Gatwick airport, which is similar to the Chennai airport in its layout. Gatwick has a single runway that is used just like Chennai’s. But the big difference is, Gatwick handled 266,550 aircraft movements in 2007. This is more than double the traffic that Chennai airport has and is more than the projected traffic for Chennai in 2015. Does Gatwick clamour for a second runway? Does it give excuses? How does it manage this large traffic flow? Simply because of ‘efficiency’ and ‘correct procedures’.
The only difference between Chennai airport and Gatwick is the ‘Rapid Exit Taxiways”. Gatwick has a minimum of two rapid exit taxiways at either end of the runway.


These taxiways are angled at about 30-45 degrees from the runway alignment. This enables the aircraft to leave the runway, after landing, at a high speed of 50-55 knots. Chennai has the taxi exits at 90 degrees to the runway alignment. Because of this, planes have to slow down to exit the runways safely. This would mean a slightly longer runway occupancy time of around 15-20 seconds more for each flight.


Runway maintenance


Another factor is the quality of runway maintenance. The exit points on the runway at Gatwick are clear of rubber deposits and the maintenance procedures are as per ICAO requirements. The exit points of Chennai airport have heavy rubber deposits and we use outdated rubber removal procedures.

The air traffic flow is also different in London and in Indian airspace. ICAO requires a minimum of 1 minute separation between aircrafts. This will amount to about 4 nautical miles between aircrafts. In India, the ATC use more than 8 nautical miles. This slows down traffic enormously.
Moreover, the ATC uses the same distance separation, irrespective of the speed of the aircraft. You may have a turboprop aircraft coming for landing at Chennai at six miles. This would take a minimum of three minutes for landing. Yet, a jet aircraft waiting for take off will not be permitted to enter the runway and take off, even though it would take just one minute to be airborne. This over-cautiousness also results in slow traffic flow.
An efficient air traffic control system uses positive speed control to maintain this minimum separation. Aircraft are specified definite speeds to be maintained at different distances from the runway. They have to comply with this speed control. If an aircraft is found to be too fast or slow, the offending aircraft is alerted. If this disregard for speed control continues, the aircraft is taken out of sequence. Discipline has to be enforced.


Flooding


Chennai does not require the parallel runway nor does it need the expansion of the second runway. I wonder whether the geographical layout of the terrain was ever considered. At the intersection of the two runways, the elevation is around 15 metres.

At the threshold of Runway 12 (the beginning of the second runway) the elevation is just 9 metres. If this portion is extended across the Adyar river, the mid-point of the river is just 2 metres in elevation. Crossing over to the north, across the river, the elevation is close to 12 metres. Anyone with ‘Google Earth’ can see this clearly.

It doesn’t require rocket science to recognise that this cup-like formation is bound to suffer severe flooding during moderate to heavy rains. We saw what happened to the present airport when the sky opened up in November 2005. The authorities had to break portions of the airport compound wall to let out the flood waters which threatened the airport.

If the extension of the second runway is to be usable, they will have to spend crores of rupees to fill the entire central section to raise the level. This, in turn, will result in blocking the overflow of excess water from Chembarambakkam lake. Does anyone care about the hundreds of families who will be affected by this?


Let us remember what Mahatma Gandhi said: “The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others”.


(The author, an airline pilot with 19,000 hours experience, specialises in accident prevention studies.)




Petitions challenging G.O. on acquiring land for airport expansion dismissed

28-Mar-2008


“Absolutely no merit in challenge raised against the acquisition”
State entitled to proceed with acquisition, hand over lands to airport: Bench


CHENNAI: The decks were cleared on Thursday for acquiring lands for Chennai airport expansion with the Madras High Court dismissing petitions challenging a government order directing the District Collector, Kancheepuram, to issue notice to land holders for acquisition purposes.

Dismissing a batch of writ petitions, the First Bench, comprising Chief Justice A.P. Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan, said it found absolutely no merit in the challenge raised against the acquisition proceedings by the State government under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act (TNALIPA) and the notices issued under the legislation.
The Bench heard arguments by Advocate-General, G. Masilamani, Assistant Solicitor-General of India P. Wilson and Airports Authority of India (AAI) counsel V.T. Gopalan, and K.M. Vijayan and N.R. Chandran for the petitioners. It held the State was entitled to proceed with the acquisition and hand over the lands to the airport authority.

The petitioners contended that the State government lacked competence to acquire the land for airport expansion as the field was occupied by Central legislation, namely the Airports Authority of India Act.

Even assuming that the acquisition could be made by the State, the same could not be done under the TNALIPA as the airport was neither an industrial area, industrial estate or an industry for the purpose of the Act for which acquisition could be made. Environmental clearance was a must for the proposed project and the same ought to have been obtained before the acquisition proceedings were initiated.

A petitioner contended that what was contemplated was only an extension of secondary runway crossing the Adyar river, which would require only 300 acres. Hence, 1,069.99 acres, spread over Manapakkam, Kolapakkam, Gerugambakkam and Tharapakkam villages, proposed for acquisition, were not required.

The Bench held that in the light of decided cases, it was clear that acquisition was an independent power. It said Mr. Gopalan and Mr. Wilson had given a categorical assurance that no construction activity would commence on the land before obtaining all environmental clearances. An application for necessary clearance had already been made.

The Advocate-General assured the court that if objections were filed on or before April 26, the District Collector would consider them on merit.

The Judges said a writ petition had been filed by the management of a residential school having more than 1,500 students. The Advocate-General assured the court that if the institution made a representation, the State would consider allotting alternative land for it in the nearby areas and also take appropriate measures for continuation of the students studies.

Regarding Kovur, the State had taken a policy decision to allot plots to householders. Referring to the contention by some plot holders that their houses were not fully completed due to the notification, and their cases also deserved to be considered for allotment of alternative land, the Bench said they were free to make a representation. If such a representation was received, the State would take appropriate decision in accordance with law.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/28/stories/2008032859761100.htm

HC allows TN govt. to acquire land for airport expansion

27-Mar-2008

Clearing the way for expansion of the Chennai Airport, the High Court here on Thursday dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the land acquisition for the project.
A Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan, passed the order, thus enabling the Tamil Nadu government to go ahead with one of its ambitious projects.
The Bench had stayed all the proceedings relating to acquisition of land for the project, in December last year.

Earlier, a set of petitions challenged the acquisition of 1069.99 acres in Manapakkam, Tharapakkam, Gerugambakkam, Kolapakkam and Kovur around the airport. The petitioners had contended that the State Government was acquiring the said land under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, though the land was not in an "industrial area" declared by the Government nor was it an "industrial estate."

They had also contended that the State Government was not competent to acquire land for the expansion, as the field was occupied by a Central organisation, Airports Authority of India (AAI).
The Bench, in its observation, said that "it is clear that the acquisition is an independent power emanating from the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution."

"In view of the foregoing discussions, we find absolutely no merit in the challenge raised to acquisition proceedings initiated by the State Government under the Act and we hold the State is entitled to proceed with the acquisition and acquire the land and hand over the same to the Airport Authority," the Bench said.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/004200803271968.htm

Airport expansion plan under scanner

27-Mar-2008


It will result in dislocation of 947 houses; High Court verdict on land acquisition soon

CHENNAI: A verdict is expected from the Madras High Court within a week on the Airport Authority of India’s land acquisition plans, but the debate on the merits of its airport expansion project rages on.


While the AAI maintains that the Rs.2,700-crore project, which will result in the dislocation of 947 houses, is crucial to Chennai’s future as a key aviation hub in India and South Asia, experts have raised questions about the necessity and merits of the plan in light of what they perceive to be inefficiencies in airspace use and the cost of displacement.


When the AAI first conceived the plan to expand the airport four years ago, it had forecast that Chennai would need to handle around 50 aircraft movements an hour by 2015. According to the AAI, the expansion plan will enable Chennai to handle traffic growth until 2016. The AAI expects the greenfield airport — Sriperumbudur is the likely location—to be ready by then.

Cross runway concerns


While the initial plan was to build a parallel runway, the AAI now also plans to extend the cross runway that has been in operation since December. The extension is the main cause for the dislocation of 947 homes — the land for the parallel runway plan is largely poromboke land, which the AAI has received clearance for acquiring (see graphic).


Airport sources say though the AAI is continuing its push for expansion, it is now reconsidering the parallel runway plan. There are, however, a number of logistic constraints in operating a cross runway. Air Traffic Controllers feel that it is not ideal for managing traffic; unlike in a parallel runway set-up, intersection of two runways imposes restrictions on speeding up aircraft movements.


The usage of the cross runway is also heavily reliant on wind patterns, and it cannot be used for three months every year. Strengthening of the clayey soil around the banks of the Adyar — the cross runway will be extended across the river — is also expected to cost a huge sum.
Airport officials also say airspace is currently not being used at full efficiency.

While there have been several proposals to construct rapid exit taxiways to minimise the lag between consecutive aircraft movements, the AAI has not yet started work on them. “The absence of rapid exit taxiways makes up 40 per cent of the problem,” says an airport officer. “Rapid exits would allow aircraft to be cleared in half the time.”


Rapid exit taxiways will allow aircraft to be cleared with a separation of four miles between them (ATCs currently follow an eight mile separation rule). Rapid exits will also allow aircraft to exit at a speed of 55 knots, but on the current exits, aircraft movement cannot exceed 30 knots.
“Given that Chennai currently handles 28 aircraft movements an hour, and rapid exits would, logically, allow them to double the aircraft movements to 56,
what then is the need for expansion in the first place?,” asks former pilot Capt. A. Ranganathan.


Another hindrance to the construction of the rapid exits is the presence of the old air traffic control tower near the end of the cross runway. “Requests have been made to demolish the old building since 2004, but nothing has been done,” an airport source says.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/27/stories/2008032759311200.htm

Bird hits at Chennai airport raise safety concerns

6-Feb-2008





BIRD’S EYE VIEW: A photograph taken from the cockpit of an aircraft gives a glimpse of the avian menace in India’s airports. In this case, a stray bird drifts on to the runway of a national airport.



CHENNAI: All it takes is a little bird the size of a sparrow to bring down a 500-tonne aeroplane.
Minutes after an Indigo airlines flight bound for New Delhi took off from the Chennai airport Friday night, a stray bird lodged itself in one of the aircraft’s engines, prompting the pilot to immediately return to base for an emergency landing.
It was carrying 114 passengers.
Friday’s bird-hit has raised questions about how well airports and their vicinities are being maintained to keep stray birds away, and how qualified pilots are to handle the bird menace.

Increase in bird strikes


There has been an increasing number of bird strikes in airports in cities such as Ahmedabad, New Delhi and Mumbai, largely as a result of poor maintenance practices and irregular dumping of garbage.
Airport sources say the authorities have taken precautions to minimise the risk of bird-hits -- for instance, by clearing butcher shops and garbage dumps in the surrounding area. But, there is much more to the problem, says Chennai-based former pilot Capt. A. Ranganathan, who has worked on the Approach and Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) project for the Directorate General of Civil Aviation.Proper maintenance


“Even if local authorities remove butcher shops, as per International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) regulations, airports should ensure that the grass [near the runway] does not grow beyond four inches. This is not done in any of the airports, and that is bound to attract birds, especially after the rain,” Capt. Ranganathan says. Birds are attracted to reptiles in the grass. A bird-nest was found near the runway of a national airport.


ICAO also mandates that a 13-km radius around airports be maintained as a sterile area with no slaughterhouses or garbage dumping grounds. But, with a number of tea shops and construction work in the Chennai airport’s vicinity and a lack of regular inspection, irregular dumping is a safety hazard, Capt. Ranganathan adds.

Irregular practices


Abrupt aircraft movements and irregular landing and take-off practices by pilots also contribute to the problem. Air Traffic Controllers say it has become common for pilots to not follow specified landing practices as they try to save time under the constraints of increasingly intense schedules. While birds may judge flight patterns up to certain distances, abrupt movements pose serious problems.



http://www.hindu.com/2008/02/06/stories/2008020658600300.htm

Govt may restrict pvt developers from bidding for third airport

24-Mar-2008

The ministry plans to restrict cos from bidding for non-metro airports if they have already won contracts for two


Claiming it wants to avoid creating new monopolies in the booming airport construction and modernization business, the civil aviation ministry is planning to restrict private developers to a maximum of two non-metro airports.
Contracts for modernization of two dozen non-metro airports across India will be opened for bidders over the next two years. It is estimated that India needs some Rs1,600 crore private investment at 35 non-metro airports, many of which have seen traffic swelling over the past three years as more low-fare airlines and international carriers enter the market.
GVK Power and Infrastructure Ltd, Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group’s Reliance Energy Ltd, GMR Infrastructure Ltd, Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd, L&T Infrastructure Ltd, Unitech Ltd, Omaxe Ltd and Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd are among those vying for business at the non-metro airports. Many of these, with little experience in airport-related development, have partnered with international airport operators such as Changi Airports International or Fraport AG to bid.
NON-METRO FOCUS
In the next three months, the selection process will require the ministry to shortlist five companies, which will then be asked to submit a financial bid before the final selection. However, since the selection criteria follows a set pattern and parameters, it is likely that the same developers, if they apply, will be shortlisted among the top five each time the government seeks a proposal for the remaining22 airports.

The ministry is planning to restrict operators from bidding for other airports if they have already won contracts for two airports, according to a senior government official familiar with the process who did not wish to be identified. A developer may be allowed to bid for more airports only after meeting project deadlines on the first two projects as stipulated by the government.
“What it basically means is that a few shall not get too much of work,” said the same official. “If someone has 10 airports to develop, work will suffer. It may also not be completed in a time-bound manner. And, we don’t want that.”
The official declined to elaborate while clarifying the new rules would not apply to metro airports, where business houses such as Bangalore-headquartered GMR Group, have already won contracts for New Delhi and Hyderabad.
Not everyone thinks it is a robust idea. “You can get out of the loop by forming a different company. Just two airports without reasoning seems hasty,” says Robey Lal, a private consultant, who was formerly a member of operations at the Airport Authority of India, or AAI.
The AAI, both a regulator for airports and an entity through which the government owns stakes in airfields in the country, is modernizing 35 non-metro airports spending more than Rs5,500 crore, but the ministry wants the development of terminals, cargo complexes, airport hotels, parking bays, and malls—collectively called city-side development—at 24 of these airports to be done with private players through what are dubbed as public-private partnership, or PPP, models.
Two city-side development contracts have already been put for up for bids at Udaipur’s Maharana Pratap Airport and Amritsar International Airport, which together have about 60 acres of land parcel to be developed.
Nearly two dozen infrastructure and construction companies are seeking to develop these two airports, compared with just five such bids thatwere received in 2005 for New Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport, which was won by GMR Infrastructure-led consortium.
Besides Amritsar, Udaipur, Tiruchirappalli and Visakhapatnam, the other airports that will be developed using the PPP model include Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Lucknow, Bhopal, Guwahati, Madurai Ranchi, Thiruvananthapuram, Mangalore, Aurangabad, Indore, Khajuraho, Dimapur, Bhubaneswar, Agartala, Varanasi, Dehradun, Raipur, Rajkot and Vadodara.
When asked how the ministry’s latest plan would impact plans, a senior Tata Realty and Infrastructure executive said his firm was “sort of losing (interest)” after waiting for four months for Amritsar and Udaipur airport contracts. “Last minute, they changed plans to privatize Kolkata and Chennai airports. I am not sure what the plan is. We need to see signs that they are serious,” said the same executive, requestinganonymity.
The ministry revisited its Udaipur privatization plan after it found that the airport had five times the land available for commercial development from what was initially estimated. The selection of financial consultants to evaluate the bids too is still being finalized.
At Kolkata and Chennai, the AAI decided to undertake expansion and modernization plans on its own.

http://www.livemint.com/2008/03/24001047/Govt-may-restrict-pvt-develope.html

Airports modernisation on time, says AAI chief

18-Mar-2008

Airports Authority of India (AAI) Chairman K Ramalingam today gave assurance that modernisation of airports, upgradation of air traffic services (ATS) and communications, and recruitment and training of air traffic controllers will be completed in time for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.

"Rest assured. all work will be completed by 2010, and you will witness seachange in infrastructure, runways and terminals," Mr Ramalingam said at the three-day Airport and Airline 2008 Expo, inaugurated by Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel during the 2nd Civil Aviation Week.

The AAI chief said the third runway at the Delhi airport would be completed by Delhi International Airport (Private) Limited (DIAL) by June, and operationalised in August-September this year after making it CAT-III compliant.

"We are working closely with DIAL. They have to build the infrastructure and we have to put the procedure in place," he added.

For the Chennai airport, he said AAI had finalised plans for its modernisation, and the work would start within two months.

He said the upgradation of Kolkata airport and the development of 35 non-metro airports would be also be done by 2010.He said a roadmap for the modernisation of ATS and communication had also been prepared.Admitting shortage of air traffic controllers, he said more were being recruited and given training within the country and abroad.

http://www.indlawnews.com/Newsdisplay.aspx?41d57bda-60bc-446a-bd92-bab9040869f9

Airport expansion: CM hits out at rivals

18-Mar-06

In a sharp reaction to media reports, Chief Minister M Karunanidhi on Tuesday castigated his political rivals for the delay in the Chennai Airport expansion plan and asserted that the scheme was not 'entangled' because of some private individuals. In a statement, referring to a report on airport expansion delay that appeared in a Tamil daily, Karunanidhi said there was not even an iota of truth in it.

The news item had alleged that the airport plan was being help up as the lands where the expansion has been proposed was owned by 'important' persons.The Chief Minister explained that some land owners go to court and easily get injunction.In such cases, it becomes an uphill task to go on appeal and get the final verdict.'This is the true reason for delay and the airport plan is not 'entangled' because of private individuals', the Chief Minister said.

Karunanidhi also regretted that whatever may be the new project, opposition and objection come in one way or the other.'My desire is that all such projects must be completed speedily without any delay,' he said.

Indirectly hitting out at his rivals, Karunanidhi quipped that if other States were able to complete such projects soon, it was because there were 'not many' who wanted to 'block' new plans.He also referred to the all-party meeting that was held on airport expansion.

http://newstodaynet.com/newsindex.php?id=5952%20&%20section=7

News in Dinamalar

17-Mar-2008





Airport projects hit a rough patch

17-Mar-2008

Employees of Airports Authority of India strike puts government in a fix; absorbing the redundant staff from the old airports is an issue

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Central Government is working on an Airports Authority of India-led PPP project for expansion and modernisation of the Kolkata and Chennai airports.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The two-day “non-cooperation movement,” a euphemism for a strike by the Airport Authority Employees Union, was called off by Thursday evening. It may at best be a truce because the basic problems raised by the agitating staff have not been addressed. In 2004, when the Central Government signed agreements with two consortia for the development of greenfield airports in Hyderabad and Bangalore, there was turbulence in the air. Even then, the Airports Authority Employees Union and allied trade unions in the country, threatened to go on strike protesting against the privatisation move. A similar strike was also in the air in relation to the proposal to privatise or corporatise Air India and Indian Airlines, even find a strategic partner.

Hard decisions

Last week, the Union Civil Aviation Ministry, the Airports Authority of India (AAI), and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had to take some hard decisions. The new Hyderabad International Airport, developed by a consortium led by the GMR group, had its soft launch on March 14 at the hands of Congress President Sonia Gandhi. Commercial operations are expected to start soon.

The government had to order the closure of the old airport at Begumpet. So the strike had an immediate provocation. After talks that extended to the second day, Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel emerged triumphant, announcing the calling off of the strike, which badly affected ground services.

Under the 2004 agreement, the government was bound to close down all the commercial operations at the existing airport, to provide the greenfield venture with all the space to generate the income for the investments made — an estimated Rs. 2,478 crore in the first phase. Mr. Patel made it clear that the Hyderabad and Bangalore old airports would remain open only for defence purposes and natural emergencies. There was a petition in the Supreme Court already, but the Centre had to operate within the framework of the agreement. Does it mean loss of jobs? Can these employees be absorbed in the new airport?

The case of Bangalore may be entirely different, even unique. The airport belongs to another public sector giant, the Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL). It has been used by the HAL for its trials, repairs, experiments, and research projects, often in tandem with the Defence services. It was also put to commercial use and became an international airport some years ago. It has been generating substantial resources for HAL. Even if commercial operations come to a halt when the Bangalore International Airport (BIAL) becomes operational, perhaps by mid-May, it will have a host of other activities to keep it going. Both Bangalore and Hyderabad old airports could be put to so much more use for the Flying Clubs or Schools considering the heightened demand for commercial pilots.

In public debates in both these southern State capitals, passengers and corporates have raised the issue: Can the cities not have two airports? After all, most western centres and developed cities have two or even more airports to cope with the growing traffic. The convenience of an airport so close to the city centre far outweighs other considerations that may force Aviation authorities and private airport developers to go 30-40 km out of the city to construct a new and modern airport.

PPP model

In its much-debated infrastructure as well as aviation policies, the Centre has repeatedly advocated a public-private-partnership (PPP) model to generate the required investments to develop the infrastructure to meet global standards. Accordingly, the government went in for partnership for the re-development of the New Delhi and Mumbai airports, opted for greenfield ventures in Hyderabad and Bangalore, and is working on an AAI-led PPP project for expansion and modernisation of the Kolkata and Chennai airports. The Tamil Nadu Government is also pressing for a new airport near Sriperumbudur, about 40 km off Chennai.

So the cases of Hyderabad and Bangalore are separate and cannot be treated on a par with Delhi or Mumbai. When the AAI remains in control over both the existing and the new airport, there will be no problem in the redeployment of manpower. But when a private investor develops a new airport, he has the freedom to run the services the way the company wants. It is the Air Traffic Control, airport security, customs and immigration facilities that will remain with the government or its agencies. The ground services will shift to the investor/operator, who can either do them in-house or outsource it.

So absorbing the redundant staff from the old airports becomes an issue. Hence, their agitation. Even assuming that the two old airports remain functional, how can they continue to deploy so many staff? These are problems that the AAI and the Civil Aviation Ministry need to sort out. Mr. Patel has assured the union that employees could be consulted in future on all such issues and agreements.

Key issue

A key issue arising from the opening of the two greenfield airports relates to levy of a passenger service fee or user development fee for the domestic and international terminals as well as passengers. While Hyderabad’s GMR group has been given the go-ahead to charge Rs. 1,000 as user fee for international passengers alone, the Bangalore fees are under consideration.BIAL has proposed charges of Rs. 675 for departing domestic passengers and Rs. 995 for departing international passengers. But it has been advised to levy an ad hoc fee on international passengers and wait for the final audited project cost to fix a charge for domestic passengers. This could upset the airfare structures, as the tax and levies could be higher than the cheaper fares offered.Though the new Bangalore airport was supposed to become operational by March 30, the aviation authorities are now suggesting any date after May 10 so that the formalities for Air Traffic Control systems and training could be completed by then.

But the real issue in opening such new airports, away from the city centre, is one of transport and communications. Railway links and good public transport become imperative before the airports become operational.Otherwise, the costs could skyrocket for ordinary passengers, and turn them away from the no-frills, low-cost airlines.

http://www.hindu.com/biz/2008/03/17/stories/2008031751261500.htm

Parallel runway plan vanishes into thin air

11- Mar-2008
CHENNAI: A few years ago, a group of engineers came up with a plan for a parallel runway at the Chennai airport to cope with the increasing air traffic, facilitating free landing and take-off. Furthermore, it was also meant to be used for even landing wide-bodied aircraft.


According to the proposal, the project would not dislocate many families: less than 1,000 houses needed to be removed. The funds meant for extending the secondary runway were to be tapped for creating the parallel runway which, the engineers argued, would help Chennai handle the increasing traffic over the next 20 years.


At a time when the world-wide trend was to minimise cross runway operations, it was not correct to take up cross runway operations at the Chennai airport, the proposal said.


A former AAI officer said cross runway could not be used as an alternative throughout the year; such operations depended mainly on the wind pattern. It could be put to use only for a few months in a year, he said.Moreover, with the single runway operations, the number of arrivals and departures could not exceed 20 aircraft. So the handling capacity of the runway could not be increased, he said. Strengthening and extension of the secondary runway would not help cope with the traffic throughout the year.


Commercially, it would restrict the load-carrying capacity of airlines, too. Compared with the cost incurred for strengthening and extending the cross runway, a parallel runway could be created which, the official said, would also be more cost-effective. But little is known about the proposal beyond


http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/11/stories/2008031159180400.htm

Air traffic goes up, but ground infrastructure lags behind City Pulse

11-Mar-2008



Growth statistics can’t camouflage the airport’s tale of woes such as poor facilities, congestion

CHENNAI: A mismatch between the growth in air traffic and the development of infrastructure is the biggest challenge Indian aviation is currently facing, and nowhere is this more acute than in the case of the Chennai airport.
The Chennai airport boasts traffic and growth figures that airports around the world would die for, but getting past the impressive vital statistics , the airport also tells the story of poor infrastructure, average facilities and congestion. Access to the airport is another major problem air-travellers in Chennai face. Road works on the doorstep of the airport remain behind schedule causing inordinate delays, while efforts to improve access to the Tirusulam railway station have also come to nought.
The Airports Authority of India (AAI) expects to spend Rs.3,400 crore on infrastructure projects around the country this year, and more than Rs.12,000 crore in the next five years. Chennai, with its significant growth, strategic location and lagging-behind infrastructure, is unsurprisingly at the centre of the AAI’s plans, allocated a whopping Rs.2,462 crore for upgrading the existing airport over the next 5 years.Much of this money will be spent on expanding the airport. The AAI believes that bringing infrastructure up to the desired levels hinges on its ambitious Rs.2,700 crore expansion project. On the 1,070 acres of the acquired land the plan proposed by the AAI includes a second runway parallel to the existing main runway .
At present, the main runway at the Chennai airport handles 28 aircraft movements an hour, according to a former AAI officer. Ideally, the officer says, the runway should not be handling more than 21 movements. There is, however, more to improving the infrastructure than just expanding the airport. Air traffic controllers admit that the radar equipment in Chennai is outdated. The AAI has been speaking of plans to modernise the air traffic control systems for months, but no improvements have yet been made.
For the amount of traffic that the Chennai airport receives, the facilities on offer, from parking to toilets, are below par, says D. Sudhakara Reddy, President, Air Passengers Association of India. Mr. Reddy says that the car-parks also need better organisation. “Cars are parked at the time of drop and pick-up in a haphazard fashion and there is no proper monitoring,” he says. The security checks also needed better administering.
While airport and government officials remain confident that the litigation over the land acquisition will soon be resolved and expansion work will shortly begin, the residents of Gerugambakkam, Tarapakkam, Manapakkam, Kolapakkam and Kovur villages have other ideas. They remain strongly opposed to the project, and are seething over how the State Government handled the process of acquiring land. Whether they are successful or not, the June 2010 deadline for completing the project is looking increasingly unlikely. The future of Chennai airport may be uncertain, but there can be no doubt that expansion or no expansion, the airport urgently requires an injection of rapid investment and improvement if it is to maintain its impressive trajectory of growth.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/11/stories/2008031157700300.htm